EXPLANATORY NOTES AND QUAINT SAYINGS (3)

Verse 1.—

Verse 1.—

Verse 1.—“They are corrupt, they have done abominable works.” Sin pleaseth the flesh. Omne simile nutrit simile. Corruption inherent is nourished by the accession of corrupt actions. Judas’s covetousness is sweetened with unjust gain. Joab is heartened and hardened with blood. 1 Kings ii. 5. Theft is fitted to and fatted in the thievish heart with obvious booties. Pride is fed with the officious compliments of observant grooms. Extortion battens in the usurer’s affections by the trolling in of his moneys. Sacrilege thrives in the church-robber by the pleasing distinctions of those sycophant priests, and helped with their not laborious profit. Nature is led, is fed with sense. And when the citadel of the heart is once won, the turret of the understanding will not long hold out. As the suffumigations of the oppressed stomach surge up and cause the headache, or as the thick spumy mists, which vapour up from the dark and foggy earth, do often suffocate the brighter air, and to us more than eclipse the sun, the black and corrupt affections, which ascend out of the nether part of the soul, do no less darken and choke the understanding. Neither can the fire of grace be kept alive at God’s altar (man’s heart), when the clouds of lust shall rain down such showers of impiety on it. Perit omne judicium, cum res transit ad affectum. Farewell the perspicuity of judgment, when the matter is put to the partiality of affection.—Thomas Adams.

Verse 1.—“They are corrupt, they have done abominable things: there is none that doeth good.” “Men,” says Bernard, “because they are corrupt in their minds, become abominable in their doings: corrupt before God, abominable before men. There are three sorts of men of which none doeth good. There are those who neither understand nor seek God, and they are the dead: there are others who understand him, but seek him not, and they are the wicked. There are others that seek him but understand him not, and they are the fools.” “O God,” cries a writer of the middle ages, “how many are here at this day who, under the name of Christianity, worship idols, and are abominable both to thee and to men! For every man worships that which he most loves. The proud man bows down before the idol of worldly power; the covetous man before the idol of money; the adulterer before the idol of beauty; and so of the rest.” And of such, saith the apostle, “They profess that they know God, but in works deny him, being abominable and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.” Titus i. 16. “There is none that doeth good.” Notice how Paul avails himself of this testimony of the epistle to the Romans, where he is proving concerning “both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin.” Rom. iii. 9.—John Mason Neale, in loc.

Verse 1.—The argument of my text is the atheist’s divinity, the brief of his belief couched all in one article, and that negative too, clean contrary to the fashion of all creeds, “There is no God.” The article but one; but so many absurdities tied to the train of it, and itself so irreligious, so prodigiously profane, that he dares not speak it out, but saith it softly to himself, in secret, “in his heart.” So the text yields these three points; Who is he? A “fool.” What he saith, “no God.” How he speaks it, “in his heart.” A fool, his bolt, and his draught. I will speak of them severally.... There is a child in years, and there is a child in manners, ætate et moribus, saith Aristotle. So there is a fool; for fools and children both are called νηπιοι. There is a fool in wit, and there is a fool in life; stultus in scientia, et stultus in conscientia, a witless and a graceless fool. The latter is worthy of the title as the first; both void of reason; not of the faculty but of the use. Yea, the latter fool is indeed the more kindly of the twain; for the sot would use his reason if he could; the sinner will not though he may. It is not the natural, but the moral fool that David means, the wicked and ungracious person, for so is the sense of the original term.... It is time we leave the person, and come unto the act. What hath this fool done? Surely nothing; he hath only said. What hath he said? Nay, nothing either; he hath only thought: for to say in heart, is but to think. There are two sorts of saying in the Scripture, one meant indeed so properly, the other but in hope; one by word of mouth, the other by thought of heart. You see the Psalmist means here the second sort. The bolt the fool here shoots is atheism: he makes no noise at the loss of it, as bowmen use; he draws and delivers closely, and stilly, out of sight, and without sound: he saith, “God is not,” but “in heart.” The heart hath a mouth; intus est os cordis, saith Augustine. God, saith Cyprian, is cordis auditor, he hears the heart; then belike it hath some speech. When God said to Moses, quare clamas? why criest thou? we find no words he uttered: silens auditur, saith Gregory, he is heard through saying nothing. There is a silent speech (Psalm iv. 4), “Commune with your own heart,” saith David, “and be still.” Speech is not the heart’s action, no more than meditation is the mouth’s. But sometimes the heart and mouth exchange offices; lingua mea meditabitur, saith David. Psalm xxxv. 28. There is lingua meditans, a musing tongue; here is cor loquens, a speaking heart. And to say the truth, the philosopher saith well, it is the heart doth all things, mens videt, mens audit, mens loquitur. It is the heart that speaks, the tongue is but the instrument to give the sound. It is but the heart’s echo to repeat the words after it. Except when the tongue doth run before the wit, the heart doth dictate to the mouth; it suggests what it shall say. The heart is the soul’s herald: look what she will have proclaimed, the heart reads it, and the mouth cries it. The tongue saith nought but what the heart saith first. Nay, in very deed, the truest and kindest speech is the heart’s. The tongue and lips are Jesuits, they lease, and lie, and use equivocations: flattery, or fear, or other by-respect, other wry respect adulterate their words. But the heart speaks as it means, worth twenty mouths, if it could speak audibly.—Richard Clerke. D.D., 1634 (one of the translators of our English Bible).

Verses 1, 4.—The Scripture gives this as a cause of the notorious courses of wicked men, that “God is not in all their thoughts.” Psalm x. 4. They forget there is a God of vengeance and a day of reckoning. “The fool” would needs enforce upon his heart, that “there is no God,” and what follows: “Corrupt they are, there is none doeth good: they eat up my people as bread,” etc. They make no more bones of devouring men and their estates, than they make conscience of eating a piece of bread. What a wretched condition hath sin brought man unto, that the great God who “filleth heaven and earth” (Jer. xxiii. 24) should yet have no place in the heart which he hath especially made for himself! The sun is not so clear as this truth, that God is, for all things in the world are because God is. If he were not, nothing could be. It is from him that wicked men have that strength they have to commit sin, therefore sin proceeds from atheism, especially these plotting sins; for if God were more thought on, he would take off the soul from sinful contrivings, and fix it upon himself.—Richard Sibbes.

Verse 2.—“To see if there were any that did understand ... seek God.” None seek him aright, and as he ought to be sought, nor can do while they live in sin; for men in seeking God fail in many things: as, First, men seek him not for himself. Secondly, they seek him not alone, but other things with him. Thirdly, they seek other things before him, as worldlings do. Fourthly, they seek him coldly or carelessly. Fifthly, they seek him inconstantly; example of Judas and Demas. Sixthly, they seek him not in his word, as heretics do. Seventhly, they seek him not in all his word, as hypocrites do. Lastly, they seek him not seasonably and timely, as profane, impenitent sinners do; have no care to depend upon God’s word, but follow their own lusts and fashions of this world.—Thomas Wilson, 1653.

Verses 2, 3.—What was the issue of God’s so looking upon men? “They are all gone aside,” that is, from him and his ways; “They are altogether become filthy;” their practices are such as make them stink; “There is none that doeth good, no, not one;” of so many millions of men as are upon the earth, there is not one doeth good. There were men of excellent parts then in the world, men of soul, but not one of them did know God, or seek after God: Paul therefore hath laid it down for a universal maxim, that the animal, natural, or intellectual man, receives not the things of the Spirit of God for they are foolishness unto him, and so are rejected by him.—William Greenhill.

Verse 3.—The ungodly are “vile” persons (Nah. i. 14). “I will make thy grave; for thou art vile.” Sin makes men base, it blots their name, it taints their blood: “They are altogether become filthy;” in the Hebrew it is, they are become stinking. Call wicked men ever so bad, you cannot call them out of their name; they are “swine” (Matt. vii. 6); “vipers” (Matt. iii. 7); “devils” (John vi. 70). The wicked are the dross and refuse (Psa. cxix. 119); and heaven is too pure to have any dross mingle with it.—Thomas Watson.

Verse 3.—“Altogether become filthy.” Thus the Roman satirist describes his own age:

Verse 3.—“There is none that doeth good, no not one.” Origen maketh a question how it could be said that there was none, neither among the Jews nor Gentiles, that did any good; seeing there were many among them which did clothe the naked, feed the hungry, and did other good things: he hereunto maketh this answer:—That like as one that layeth a foundation, and buildeth upon it a wall or two, yet cannot be said to have built a house till he have finished it; so although those might do some good things, yet they attained not unto perfect goodness, which was only to be found in Christ. But this is not the apostle’s meaning only to exclude men from the perfection of justice; for even the faithful and believers were short of that perfection which is required; he therefore showeth what men are by nature, all under sin and in the same state of damnation, without grace and faith in Christ: if any perform any good work, either it is of grace, and so not of themselves, or if they did it by the light of nature, they did it not as they ought, and so it was far from a good work indeed.—Andrew Willet (1562-1621), on Romans iii. 10.

Verse 4.—“Have the workers of iniquity no knowledge?” Men’s ignorance is the reason why they fear not what they should fear. Why is it that the ungodly fear not sin? Oh, it’s because they know it not. “Have the workers of iniquity no knowledge?” Sure enough they have none, for “they eat up my people as they eat bread;” such morsels would scald their mouths, they would not dare to be such persecutors and destroyers of the people of God; they would be afraid to touch them if they did but know what they did.—Richard Alleine.

Verse 4.—“Who eat up my people as they eat bread.”—That is, quotidiè, daily, saith Austin; as duly as they eat bread; or, with the same eagerness and voracity. These man-eaters, these Λαοβόροι, cruel cannibals, make no more conscience to undo a poor man, than to eat a good meal when they are hungry. Like pickerels in a pond, or sharks in the sea, they devour the poorer, as those do the lesser fishes; and that many times with a plausible, invisible consumption; as the usurer, who, like the ostrich, can digest any metal; but especially money.—John Trapp.

Verse 4.—“Who eat up my people as they eat bread.” Oh, how few consult and believe the Scriptures setting forth the enmity of wicked men against God’s people! The Scripture tells us “they eat up God’s people as bread,” which implies a strange inclination in them to devour the saints, and that they take as great delight therein as a hungry man in eating, and that it is natural to them to molest them. The Scripture compares them, for their hateful qualities, to the lions and bears, to foxes for subtlety, to wild bulls, to greedy swine, to scorpions, to briers and thorns (grievous and vexing things). The Scripture represents them as industrious and unwearied in their bloody enterprises, they cannot sleep without doing mischief. Herodias had rather have the blood of a saint than half a kingdom. Haman would pay a great fine to the king that the scattered Jews (who keep not the king’s laws) may be cut off. Wicked men will run the hazard of damning their own souls, rather than not fling a dagger at the apple of God’s eye. Though they know what one word—aha!—cost, yet they will break through all natural, civil, and moral obligations, to ruin God’s people. The Holy Ghost calls them “implacable” men, fierce and headstrong; they are like the hot oven for fury, like the sea for boundless rage; yet “who hath believed” this Scripture “report”? Did we believe what enemies all wicked men are unto all saints, we should not lean to our own prudence and discretion to secure us from any danger by these men; we would get an ark to secure us from the deluge of their wrath; if at any time we be cast among them and delivered, we would bless God with the three children, that the hot fiery oven did not consume us; we would not wonder when we hear of any of their barbarous cruelty, but rather wonder at God’s restraining them every day; we would be suspicious of receiving hurt when cast among light and frothy companions; we would shun their company as we do lions and scorpions; we would never commit any trust or secret into their hands; we would not be light-hearted whilst in their society; we would not rely on their promises any more than we would on the promise of the devil, their father; we would long for heaven, to be delivered from “the tents of Kedar;” we would not count any of the saints secured from danger, though related to any great wicked man; we would not twist ourselves with them by matching ourselves or children to these sons and daughters of Belial; neither would we make choice of devils to be our servants.—Lewis Stuckley.