Make the supposition that God had pardoned sin without an atonement, and pardoned not only some but all the family of man, and what is the inference which intelligent and moral beings should have been disposed to draw from this act? That God is gracious, and that his grace is altogether without limits? We presume not. Would it not be a much more reasonable inference that sin, the violation of his law, was no evil, no great evil at least, not such an evil as it had been supposed to be, seeing it could be so easily passed over by a Being of absolute moral perfection? This we have no hesitation in saying, would be the more natural inference of the two.
William Symington — "Objections to Atonement Considered," in William Symington, On the Atonement and Intercession of Jesus Christ (New York: Robert Carter & Brothers, 1868), p. 32
Citation look off? Sign in to suggest a source or rate accuracy.
Where this is from
Work title, edition, or primary text used to cite this quote.
Margin notes
Discussion
Share context, ask questions, or discuss this quote. Comments are separate from source proposals and verification ratings.
No comments yet.
Loading…