Welcome

Thanks for checking out the site! Feel free to poke around and don't worry if you break things, (we're in early development).

Archive
Needs sources

Reformed Epistemology by Cornelius Van Til

Added by Postmilstill archive ·

Coming now to discuss that form of Christian epistemology which we consider most satisfactory, we already know from the standard of criticism employed throughout the previous chapters that the Reformed view makes the claim of having alone done greatest justice to the principium speciale. 'Calvinism is Theism come to its own.' That, as so many others, was a profound and comprehensive statement of Dr. Warfield. Calvinism alone, with its doctrine of the total dependence of man upon God, a dependence which is absolute and which nevertheless does not violate but brings out the true exercise of the human faculties, Calvinism alone could develop a truly biblical theology and philosophy. Calvinism alone, with its covenant-theology could make God the interpretive category of all reality, and thus afford the necessary universal validity. Calvinism alone could offer such a metaphysics upon which a valid epistemology could be constructed. So also with the principium speciale. Calvinism alone with its doctrine of the nature of man and the image of God in man did justice to the noetic influence of sin. The full and open recognition of the loss of God's imagein the narrower sense through sin, and the retention of that image in the wider sense through common grace could alone open the way for a valuation of the influence of sin upon the consciousness of man that should neither over nor underestimate the same.

Source Evidence

Reformed Epistemology

Community verification

Help verify accuracy, sources, and attribution. Pick one action below — you don't need to fill out everything.

Needs sources

0 ratings

Rate this quote (sign in required)

Sign in to rate this quote and affect community trust scores.

Contribute

Choose what you want to add. Each option opens its own short form.

Discussion

Share context, ask questions, or discuss this quote. Comments are separate from source proposals and verification ratings.

All discussions →

    No comments yet.

Related Quotes

Related by source, book, author, or topic.

Added by Postmilstill archive ·

The criticism that is valid against Kant is valid against later idealism as well. All idealism is at a loss to interpret the phenomenon of error or evil. As was already noted earlier it will not do to limit the question…

Added by Postmilstill archive ·

If there are no brute facts, if brute facts are mute facts, it must be maintained that all facts are revelational of the true God. If facts may not be separated from faith, neither may faith be separated from facts. Ever…

Added by Postmilstill archive ·

he Christian apologist must place himself upon the position of his opponent, assuming the correctness of his method merely for argument's sake, in order to show him that on such a position the 'facts' are not facts and t…

Added by Postmilstill archive ·

Now the question is not whether the non-Christian can weigh, measure, or do a thousand other things. No one denies that he can. But the question is whether on his principle the non-Christian can account for his own or an…

Added by Postmilstill archive ·

It ought to be pretty plain now what sort of God I believe in. It is God, the All-Conditioner. It is the God who created all things, Who by His providence conditioned my youth, making me believe in Him, and who in my lat…

Cornelius Van Til · What I Believe and Why I Believe What I Believe
Open quote →
Added by Postmilstill archive ·

But if it be said to such opponents of Christianity that, unless there were an absolute God their own questions and doubts would have no meaning at all, there is no argument in return.